While there are good reasons to assess fitness-of-purpose based on these common and widely understood attributes, these are precisely the features that also constrain laptops and make them less agile than tablets in mNy contexts.
It took a while, but afterthoughts of a recent article tugged at me for most of the week. This article (and real-life) experience had me thinking “try that with your laptop”!
In the iPad versus laptop debate, we tend to accentuate the capabilities of laptops with a preconceived bias that iPad must be the lesser tool simply because it lacks a keyboard and storage. Why is that? Is it simply because of its size, weight, overall power, and storage? Or is it that we are simply biased; we have experience doing stuff with laptops and we fully understand its bounds. Besides, how could a device designed for content reading and browsing ever have a fitness-of-purpose that exceeds a laptop’s abilities?
What if we stepped back and tried to counterweight this natural bias by thinking about the ways that iPad actually outmaneuvers laptops in meaningful ways. Are there contexts where your laptop simply cannot compete?
Here are some scenarios that look at the debate from a different perspective.
-
imagine you’re a passenger riding in a bouncy jeep over a mountain pass. You realize it’s imperative that you quickly create a high resolution diagram for a client and mail is as soon as possible. The diagram is going require lots of blocks and connectors to effectively communicate your ideas. In the back seat you have a Windows laptop with Visio and an iPad with OmniGraffle. Both devices are capable to building the diagram and tethering with your iPhone for transmission of the diagram. Which device are you going to reach for given this context?
-
Imagine you’re just getting settled on a plane and a really important client texts you requesting a three page advisory briefing explaining your position on a particular social media strategy. In the overhead compartment you have a 17″ laptop with a fully charged battery. In your executive style brief tucked into the seat pocket in front of you, there’s an iPad that luckily contains a recent podcast with many of the details that have shaped your social media viewpoints that the client is asking about. The flight is about five hours and you’re in coach but you didn’t upgrade to the the premium legroom section. Which device are you going to reach for given this context?
-
Imagine you’re attending a major conference in your industry segment. Your objective, as a business development executive, is to visit more than 75 vendors over a two day period on the trade show flow. In the context if this task, you are responsible for collecting notes, taking photos, and ranking sales opportunities using a web application. On the desk in your hotel room you have a nice Dell notebook and an iPad 2. As you prepare for the day by highlighting the vendors on the trades or floor map, you have to decide which device you’ll use to capture the data your company needs. Which device are you going to reach for given this context?
If you have some real-life experiences like mine, please share them.
IPad can do many things that laptops can’t, just sayin’ …















You are about to get on a plane and fly for three hours. On this flight you want to review some recent podcasts and and a half dozen TED videos. Your weapon of choice is iPhone, laptop, or iPad. Which wins?
Regardless of the seating class (first, plus, or economy), iPad would probably be the wisest choice because when you land, you’ll likely want your iPhone battery at the highest possible charge. If you’re flying from west to east battery life may not make a difference since you’ll likely be landing at the close of business unless it’s a red-eye. I sense a decision matrix coming on. ;-)
“You’re objective, as a business development executive,” should be:
“Your objective, as a business development executive,”.
You are traveling to a client site with lots of documents. They weigh a ton combined with your luggage. So you leave the laptop at home. Even just for going through security check points — you don’t have to take the iPad out of the bag.
More proof this site is 100% authored on iOS. ;-) Thanks for the catch (again).
[...] 11 votes by Anjali Ramachandran, Dean Jones, Tom Marshall, (more)UPDATE: Relevant to this topic …http://ipadcto.com/2011/04/02/wh… From a business perspective, I studied this exact question for a solid month comparing my use of [...]
At what point in the average American’s life will anyone be in a jeep on a rock road typing a business paper? Also he didn’t state ANY normal scenarios for example; I have a paper to do tomorrow and I need to type 10 pages. Which is better? I’m a Microsoft word junky. Which is better? The author of this page clearly has a bias for the iPad. Notice iPad’s flaws were never mentioned (i.e.) no flash player
Malik,
I think you’re missing the point and perhaps I’m not making it very clear. It’s not that people (average Americans) need to create digital media and documents on a snowy pass in a Jeep. This true story reveals a degree of agility that other mobile computing products and software have a difficult time addressing. If it is able to rise to this sort of challenge, it is likely able to rise to many challenges, most of which have never been attempted before. The odds are pretty good that many iPad users have similar stories. Where they were previously unable to meet important business deadlines because of unfavorable mobile work conditions, they are now able to perform tasks in a much wider range of situations. This suggests that when iPad is paired with certain well-designed apps, it has the ability to widen the use cases for mobile work. The purpose of this article was not to expose normal scenarios – those are plentiful on the web. Exposing an unusual scenario demonstrates why iPad is able to redraw the boundaries of mobile performance, the true point of the article.
As to your assertion that I am biased, you are absolutely right. I, like everyone who are rational people, tend to develop biases toward things that work and biases counter to things that don’t work or don’t work as well. You are [apparently] biased toward Microsoft Word and my hunch is this bias emerged because it worked well for you.
Concerning your comment about iPad flaws, I agree – there are many. However, in certain ranges of work and use-cases, iPad is regarded as “flawless”. Microsoft Word is considered flawless if the work task matches its features and reliability requirements. However, a quad-core desktop PC would be considered flawed if you wanted to use it to take air quality samples in a mine.
How could the iPad fit into the Future of Work?…
iPad is offering some new ways to work and this change seems to be driven by many attributes of the device as well as apps, the touch interface, and increased mobility. New Productivity from Touch Few of us realize that iPad’s touch interface [alone] …